Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 33, No. 5, September-October 1985, pp. 955-970
DOI: 10.1287/opre.33.5.955
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeney, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Winkler, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Evaluating Decision Strategies for Equity of Public Risks

Ralph L. Keeney, Robert L. Winkler

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Many important decisions include the loss of life among their possible consequences. Alternative actions have different implications for the number of possible fatalities, the equity of those eventual fatalities, and the equity of the process resulting in those fatalities. This paper defines a concept of ex ante risk equity to address the equity of the process and distinguishes this concept from the ex post risk equity of the fatalities. The paper indicates that an analysis of decision strategies addresses ex ante equity. In this context, both types of equity as well as loss of life are included in a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility model developed to evaluate public risks. This approach provides a method to investigate the implications of different value judgments in examining alternatives and illustrates an appropriate use of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility for problems involving social consequences such as public risks.

Subject classifications: 91 criteria for equitable risks; 521 evaluating strategies for equity; 852 multiattribute evaluation of equity.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. A. Ubel, J. Baron, and D. A. Asch
Preference for Equity As a Framing Effect
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2001; 21(3): 180 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. B. Deber and V. Goel
Using Explicit Decision Rules to Manage Issues of Justice, Risk, and Ethics in Decision Analysis: When Is It Not Rational to Maximize Expected Utility?
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1990; 10(3): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by INFORMS.