Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 51, No. 5, September-October 2003, pp. 681-710
DOI: 10.1287/opre.51.5.681.16755
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagel, K.
Right arrow Articles by Woesler, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling

Kai Nagel, Peter Wagner, Richard Woesler

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Department of Computer Science, ETH Zentrum, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Transportation Research, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Transportation Research, Rutherfordstrasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany

nagel{at}inf.ethz.ch
richard.woesler{at}dlr.de
peter.wagner{at}dlr.de

Certain aspects of traffic flow measurements imply the existence of a phase transition. Models known from chaos and fractals, such as nonlinear analysis of coupled differential equations, cellular automata, or coupled maps, can generate behavior which indeed resembles a phase transition in the flow behavior. Other measurements point out that the same behavior could be generated by geometrical constraints of the scenario. This paper looks at some of the empirical evidence, but mostly focuses on different modeling approaches. The theory of traffic jam dynamics is reviewed in some detail, starting from the well-established theory of kinematic waves and then veering into the area of phase transitions. One aspect of the theory of phase transitions is that, by changing one single parameter, a system can be moved from displaying a phase transition to not displaying a phase transition. This implies that models for traffic can be tuned so that they display a phase transition or not.

This paper focuses on microscopic modeling, i.e., coupled differential equations, cellular automata, and coupled maps. The phase transition behavior of these models, as far as it is known, is discussed. Similarly, fluid-dynamical models for the same questions are considered. A large portion of this paper is given to the discussion of extensions and open questions, which makes clear that the question of traffic jam dynamics is, albeit important, only a small part of an interesting and vibrant field. As our outlook shows, the whole field is moving away from a rather static view of traffic toward a dynamic view, which uses simulation as an important tool.

Subject classifications: Transportation, models, traffic; Simulation: traffic flow models.
History: Received March 2001; revision received July 2002; revision received January 2003; accepted January 2003.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.