Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 53, No. 6, November-December 2005, pp. 946-956
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1050.0225
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gustafsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Salo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Contingent Portfolio Programming for the Management of Risky Projects

Janne Gustafsson, Ahti Salo

Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Otakaari 1M, P.O. Box 1100, 02015 HUT, Finland
Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Otakaari 1M, P.O. Box 1100, 02015 HUT, Finland

janne.gustafsson{at}tkk.fi
ahti.salo{at}tkk.fi

Methods for selecting a research and development (R&D) project portfolio have attracted considerable interest among practitioners and academics. This notwithstanding, the industrial uptake of these methods has remained limited, partly because of the difficulties of capturing relevant concerns in R&D portfolio management. Motivated by these difficulties, we develop contingent portfolio programming (CPP), which extends earlier approaches in that it (i) uses states of nature to capture exogenous uncertainties, (ii) models resources through dynamic state variables, and (iii) provides guidance for the selection of an optimal project portfolio that is compatible with the decision maker’s risk attitude. Although CPP is presented here in the context of R&D project portfolios, it is applicable to a variety of investment problems where the dynamics and interactions of investment opportunities must be accounted for.

Subject classifications: research and development: project selection; decision analysis: theory; programming: linear; applications.
History: Received November 2002; revision received November 2003; accepted July 2004.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.