This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rothkopf, M. H. Search for Related Content

Thirteen Reasons Why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Process Is Not Practical

MSIS Department and RUTCOR, Rutgers University, 640 Bartholomew Road, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8003
rothkopf{at}rutcor.rutgers.edu

In theory, the mathematically elegant Vickrey-Clarke-Groves process offers perfect efficiency with dominant truth-revealing strategies. However, it has many serious practical problems. This paper describes these problems and argues that research that aims to maintain the dominant truth-revealing strategies while compromising on the other practical issues is of limited practical value.

Subject classifications: auctions; mechanism design; truth-revealing strategies.
History: Received December 2005; revision received January 2007; accepted January 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Harstad and A. S. Pekec Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf Interfaces, September 1, 2008; 38(5): 367 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Rothkopf Decision Analysis: The Right Tool for Auctions Decision Analysis, September 1, 2007; 4(3): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]