This Article Full Text (PDF) e-companion References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cuoco, D. Articles by Isaenko, S. Search for Related Content

Optimal Dynamic Trading Strategies with Risk Limits

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Lehman Brothers Japan, Inc., 10-1-6 Roppongi, Tokyo, Japan
The John Molson School, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1M8
cuoco{at}wharton.upenn.edu
hhe{at}lehman.com
sisaenko{at}jmsb.concordia.ca

Value at Risk (VaR) has emerged in recent years as a standard tool to measure and control the risk of trading portfolios. Yet, existing theoretical analysis of the optimal behavior of a trader subject to VaR limits has produced a negative view of VaR as a risk-control tool. In particular, VaR limits have been found to induce increased risk exposure in some states and an increased probability of extreme losses. However, these conclusions are based on models that are either static or dynamically inconsistent. In this paper, we formulate a dynamically consistent model of optimal portfolio choice subject to VaR limits and show that the concerns expressed in earlier papers do not apply if, consistently with common practice, the VaR limit is reevaluated dynamically. In particular, we find that the optimal risk exposure of a trader subject to a VaR limit is always lower than that of an unconstrained trader and that the probability of extreme losses is also lower. We also consider risk limits formulated in terms of tail conditional expectation (TCE), a coherent risk measure often advocated as an alternative to VaR, and show that in our dynamic setting it is always possible to transform a TCE limit into an equivalent VaR limit, and conversely.

Subject classifications: investment; management; portfolio.
History: Received February 2006; revision received January 2007; accepted January 2007.